![]() ![]() ![]() With a bit more poking around, you can also find the system used for the benchmark, which in this case is listed as a Micro-Star GF63 Thin 8SC – so it looks like MSI could be preparing an addition to its GF series of gaming laptops. All the AMD products mentioned here are the desktop variants, though.Īs for evidence that this is a mobile version of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 being tested, the CPU used in this particular benchmark was Intel’s Coffee Lake Core i7-8750H, which is a mobile SoC. Based on 528472 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GTX 1050 and the GTX 1650, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 701. If you move to the midrange of the AMD Radeon 500 series, then the RX 570 (60.9% 57th) puts the GeForce GTX 1650 in its place. UserBenchmark: Intel Core i5-6500 BX80662I56500 Intel BX80662I56500 Core i5-6500 BENCHMARKS (241,476) MKT (0.6) BUILDS SPECS (18) BUY 146 6617,777 Superseded by the Core i5-7500 4 Cores, 4 Threads 3.2GHz, Skylake. In UserBenchmark’s table at least, the newcomer soundly thrashes the RX 550 (20.8% 139th) and also outpaces the RX 560 (31.3% 98th). A mob of marketers steamroll social media with anonymous accounts. However, it seems the GPU performed as expected: For instance, it placed ahead of all of the variants of the GeForce GTX 1050 – Ti, desktop, laptop, Max-Q, etc.Īs for the AMD competition, a mobile Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 GPU would offer entry-level to midrange performance, so it would possibly go up against challengers such as the RX 550 or RX 560. Based on 676487 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GTX 1650 and the RTX 3060, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 701. We are an independent team of scientists and engineers. Only one sample has been tested, so obviously the results have a high error of margin. It appears the mobile version of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 has made a visit to UserBenchmark. Based on 14601 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GeForce GT 330M and the GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |